Skip to main content

Airport Security . . . or is it?

Hats off to Justina - a member of the security team at the Calgary International Airport.  I had the privilege of meeting her this week, and I must say that she made pretty darn sure she followed every single rule in the book, and then some, when it was my turn to pass through her little kingdom. Too bad other security officers don't do the same.

Justina confiscated my half-used tube of expensive hand cream, and my nearly empty jar of Vicks Vapo Rub.  When I indicated my ticked-offedness, she proceeded to search my carry-on bag and my purse as if she were looking for gold.  She was rude, unprofessional, refused to answer my questions, and I think she was disappointed that she did not find anything in my bags other than the usual female stuff.

I felt totally violated.

Now don't misunderstand.  I am not in disagreement with Transport Canada's rules and regulations when it comes to what can or cannot be taken on board an aircraft.  But, I have traveled through airports all over Canada and the US with those very same confiscated items for years.  As a matter of fact, just two days before said incident with Justina, I had cleared security in another Canadian airport with no problems.  The security officer there even pulled out my hand cream, looked at it, and put it back in my bag. 

My issue is with Transport Canada's lack of consistency in this matter.

So why is it that some officers do this and some don't?  It's obvious why all officers are not equal in this regard.  If every officer were to search carry-on bags as thoroughly as Justina did mine, one would need to arrive at the airport 5 hours before a scheduled flight, because the line-ups at security would be miles long.  You can imagine the uproar.  So, I figure that airport security has a rotating schedule for their officers.  Justina's turn to be the bad guy was on Tuesday, and I just happened to chose her line.

This is hardly an effective way of control.

The rules don't make sense.  The rules aren't consistently enforced.  And the rules change, depending on who the airport security person is.

I've fired off a nice little email (well, maybe not so nice) to Transport Canada about this.  We'll see if they respond.

Oh yeah, almost forgot.  Why didn't Justina say a word about my six-inch long metal nail file?

Comments

  1. They won't respond. But you're right, they should be consistent. I've been in similar situations, and it's ridiculous. Either follow the rules, or don't, but everyone needs to be doing the same thing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wilfred Laurier 1907 Speech

--> I think this is is something that needs to be forwarded until every Canadian with a computer receives it. The year is 1907, one hundred and three years ago. -->   Wilfrid Laurier's ideas on Immigrants and being a Canadian in 1907. 'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes a Canadian and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet a Canadian, and nothing but a Canadian.  T here can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is a Canadian, but something else also, isn't a Canadian at all. We have room for but one flag, the Canadian flag. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and t...

Revival

It's been seven years since the last post. Back then, I thought North America was going to hell in a handbasket. Little did I know what was to come. Looking back, I long for the days when heating oil in a basement was the worst of my worries when it came to the stupidity of humanity. These days, I can't even read the news without getting anxious, stressed out, and just plain pissed off. So SYPH and GH is being revived. I couldn't care less if anyone reads this or not. It's more of a venting outlet than anything. Opinions that were strong when this all started are even stronger. The divide between the right and the left is even wider. My commentary will likely be even more colourful. If you don't like it, well, you can just shut your pie hole and go home.

It's about time for a little global recognition.

G-20 Nations Should Look to Canada for How to Build a Better Economy I can't even begin to describe how proud I am to be Canadian after reading this article.  Not to mention the fact that it was written by Americans. I was pleased to see Stephen Harper shown in a good light.  The gentlemen who wrote the article seem to have more respect for our Prime Minister than many Canadians. Despite the rantings of so many Canadians, it's been proven that Canada is indeed recovering faster than the majority of countries around the world. If you're not proud of that, you can shut your pie hole and go home.